In Brief
This case concerns a writ appeal challenging an interim order that permitted a retail outlet to continue operating while defects in a trade licence application were cured. The Municipality appealed the Single Judge's decision granting interim stay of closure proceedings and directing the petitioner to rectify specified deficiencies. The Supreme Court held that the Single Judge's interim order was based on a proper prima facie assessment and contained no illegality or jurisdictional error warranting interference. The Court affirmed that the appellant could file a counter-affidavit and present materials before the trial court for full resolution. The writ appeal was dismissed, preserving the appellant's right to contest the substantive issues before the Single Judge.
The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.