Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Thursday, 30 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2025-07-14 allowed

PANDURANGAN vs T. JAYARAMA CHETTIAR & ANR

Bench: 2 — Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, Joymalya Bagchi

In Brief

The Supreme Court allowed an appeal by a property purchaser against a High Court order upholding the rejection of his suit. The trial court had dismissed the suit as barred by an earlier ex parte decree using Order VII, Rule 11 CPC. The Court held that res judicata cannot be decided at the preliminary stage when the plaint contains specific allegations of fraud, collusion, or jurisdictional defects in the earlier decree. Such enquiry requires in-depth examination of both decrees and cannot be determined merely from assertions in the application. The Court restored the suit for determination on merits.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Civil Procedure Res Judicata Pleadings Ex Parte Decree Collusion Jurisdiction

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login