Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Sunday, 20 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-05-09 allowed

Parle Agro (P) Ltd. & Ors vs Commissioner of Commercial Taxes & Ors

Bench: 2 — Ashok Bhushan

In Brief

Parle Agro manufactures 'Appy Fizz', a fruit juice-based drink with 10%+ apple juice. Tax authorities reclassified it as "aerated branded soft drink" at 20% VAT instead of the 12.5% rate for "fruit juice-based drinks." The Supreme Court held that 'Appy Fizz' is correctly classified as a fruit juice-based drink under Entry 71(5) of the Kerala VAT Act, not as an aerated branded soft drink under Section 6(1)(a). The Court emphasized that scientific and technical meanings (not just commercial parlance) apply to technical terms like "aerated," and that the CO2 in the product serves preservation purposes only. The judgment sets aside tax assessments and remits proceedings for consequential orders.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Tax Law Value Added Tax Product Classification Statutory Interpretation Scientific and Technical Meaning Food Law and Regulation Tariff and HSN Classification Administrative Law Clarification Proceedings

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login