Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Friday, 07 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-03-29 dismissed

PATTU RAJAN vs THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU

Bench: 3 — N.V. Ramana, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, Indira Banerjee

In Brief

Pattu Rajan and others were convicted of murdering Santhakumar and hiding the body, with the trial court finding them guilty under IPC Sections 364, 304, and 201. The High Court affirmed the conviction but upgraded the charge to Section 302 (murder). The Supreme Court upheld the conviction, rejecting arguments that the murder FIR was improperly registered as a continuation of an earlier abduction case. The Court found that the incidents were distinct in time, place, and intention. It affirmed that identification based on superimposition test was properly admitted as corroborating evidence alongside witness testimony, clothing identification, and scar marks. The Court emphasized that the prosecution proved guilt through strong circumstantial evidence including motive, last seen testimony, and body recovery, with the accused's failure to explain these circumstances creating adverse inference.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Law Murder Abduction Circumstantial Evidence Criminal Procedure FIR Registration Expert Evidence Identification of Deceased Superimposition Test Last Seen Doctrine

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login