In Brief
Four appellants were convicted of murder and conspiracy for allegedly killing a man at the instigation of another accused in exchange for money. The trial court and High Court relied primarily on statements the appellants gave to police in custody and the subsequent recovery of the dead body. The Supreme Court reversed the convictions, holding that the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The evidence showed the police and family witnesses already knew about the death and body location before recording the accused's statements, undermining the crucial legal basis (Section 27 of Evidence Act) for admitting the incriminating statements. The Court found the chain of circumstantial evidence incomplete and cautioned that suspicion, however strong, cannot substitute for proof.
The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.