Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Friday, 07 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-04-09 allowed

PEER SINGH vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

Bench: 3 — Ranjan Gogoi, Deepak Gupta, Sanjiv Khanna

In Brief

Three men were convicted of murder under sections 302, 148 and 149 IPC for allegedly participating in an attack that killed Babu Singh. The appellants appealed, arguing they were not present at the scene. The Supreme Court allowed the appeals after finding that the initial complaint (Dehati Nalishi) recorded at the spot did not name any of the three appellants. The main eyewitness (PW-5), though present and able to identify some accused, had omitted the appellants' names from his police statement. Without plausible explanation for these critical omissions, the Court held that grave doubt existed regarding their presence and acquitted them on the ground that the benefit of doubt must go to the accused.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Procedure Evidence Law Murder Eyewitness Testimony Burden of Proof

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login