Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Sunday, 20 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-07-28 partly_allowed

Pradip Ramdhani Vishwakarma vs State of Maharashtra

Bench: 2 — <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

The accused-appellant's bail had been cancelled by the High Court on 20 December 2016, though it was initially granted on 28 November 2016. The Supreme Court reviewed the High Court's grounds for cancellation and noted that three co-accused persons were themselves on bail in the same proceedings. The Court found the cancellation unjustified, set aside the High Court's order, and restored the bail. The appellant was directed to cooperate with investigation and appear before the trial court as required.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Procedure Bail Constitutional Law

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login