Breaking Supreme Court of India Advocates Balanced Approach to Diwali Firecracker Regulations
New Delhi · Saturday, 07 November 2026
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-03-07 dismissed

Pratibha Pratisthan & Ors vs Manager, Canara Bank & Ors

Bench: 2 — Madan B. Lokur

In Brief

The Supreme Court examined whether a Trust could file a complaint under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The Court held that a Trust cannot file such a complaint because the Act's definition of 'person' is exhaustive and does not include a Trust. Since 'consumer' is defined as a 'person' who buys goods or avails services for consideration, and a 'complainant' must be either a consumer or fall within specified statutory categories (which do not include a Trust), a Trust lacks standing under the Act. The appeals were dismissed on this jurisdictional ground, without examining the substantive merits.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Consumer Protection Consumer Disputes Capacity to Sue Statutory Interpretation

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login