Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Friday, 07 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-03-15 allowed

Principal Commissioner of Income Tax vs Yes Bank Ltd

Bench: 2 — Abhay Manohar Sapre

In Brief

Yes Bank Limited sought a deduction under Section 35-D of the Income Tax Act, 1961, claiming to be an industrial undertaking. The Income Tax Department challenged this in the High Court under Section 260-A. Although the High Court heard the appeal, it dismissed it without framing substantial questions of law or deciding the core issue of whether a bank qualifies as an industrial undertaking under Section 35-D. The Supreme Court held the High Court's order unsustainable and remanded the case, directing the High Court to frame proper substantial questions of law and decide the appeal on merits according to law."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Income Tax Tax Deductions Industrial Undertakings Appellate Procedure High Court Review

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login