Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Friday, 07 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-03-15 allowed

Principal Commissioner of Income Tax vs Yes Bank Ltd

Bench: 2 — Abhay Manohar Sapre

In Brief

Yes Bank Ltd claimed a tax deduction under Section 35-D of the Income Tax Act on the ground that it was an industrial undertaking. The Income Tax Commissioner rejected the claim, but the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal. The Revenue then appealed to the High Court, which dismissed it without framing substantial questions of law or deciding the core issue. The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's order and remanded the case, holding that Section 260-A appeals must be properly adjudicated with substantive questions of law framed and decided, rather than dismissed without addressing the merits."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Income Tax Tax Deductions Industrial Undertakings Appellate Jurisdiction Procedural Law

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login