Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Monday, 03 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2021-07-26 allowed

Pruthiviraj Jayantibhai Vanol vs Dinesh Dayabhai Vala and Others

Bench: 2 — Navin Sinha

In Brief

On 1 October 2003, the deceased was assaulted by four respondents with iron pipes, sticks, and rods, suffering fatal injuries. The eyewitness (PW2, the pillion rider) and an independent security guard (PW10) testified they clearly identified the known respondents. The trial court convicted respondents 1–4 under Section 302 IPC. However, the High Court acquitted them, reasoning that the eyewitness evidence contradicted the medical findings regarding injury patterns. The Supreme Court reversed the acquittal, holding that the ocular evidence was credible and consistent with medical evidence (the iron rod had a sharp turned edge capable of causing the observed wounds), and that identification was reliable given the parties' prior acquaintance. Conviction under Section 302 was restored; respondents 1–3 were directed to surrender within two weeks to serve the remainder of their life sentences.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Law Evidence Murder Identification Credibility of Witnesses Appreciation of Evidence Medical Evidence

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login