Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Saturday, 08 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-09-11 allowed

PSA Mumbai Investments Pte. Limited vs Board of Trustees of The Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust and Anr

Bench: 2 — R.F. Nariman

In Brief

A Singapore-registered company (PSA Mumbai) and an Indian company formed a consortium to bid for a container terminal project at Jawaharlal Nehru Port under a tender process. After their financial bid was accepted, the Port Authority issued a Letter of Award. Before the Concession Agreement could be signed, disputes arose and the Authority invoked an arbitration clause from the draft Concession Agreement. The Supreme Court held that a Letter of Award does not constitute a binding contract—it requires further steps, including final signing of the Concession Agreement. The arbitration clause applies only after contract execution, not during the bidding stage. Disputes during bidding must be resolved by courts as specified in the tender documents. The appeal was allowed and the Arbitrator's decision reinstated.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Arbitration Contract Law Tender Process Bidding Arbitration Agreement Offer and Acceptance

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login