Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Saturday, 08 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-01-08 allowed

Punjab State Electricity Board and Another vs Thana Singh and Others

Bench: 2 — R. Banumathi

In Brief

Sub Fire Officers employed by the Punjab State Electricity Board sought parity of pay with Head Clerks, Head Clerk-cum-Divisional Accountants, and Internal Auditors, all categorized in Group XII. The High Court allowed their claim based on group placement alone. The Supreme Court reversed this, holding that mere placement in the same group does not establish entitlement to equal pay. Parity of pay requires wholesale identity in qualifications, recruitment mode, nature of duties, and responsibilities. The respondents failed to prove such identity. The Court emphasized that pay scale determination is an executive function and courts should not interfere without evidence of complete similarity between posts.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Constitutional Law Administrative Law Service Law Pay Scales Discrimination Equal Pay

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login