Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Friday, 31 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2024-04-02 allowed

PURNI DEVI & ANR vs BABU RAM & ANR

Bench: 2 — Sanjay Karol, Aravind Kumar

In Brief

A plaintiff sought to execute a civil judgment but initially approached the Tehsildar (an administrative officer), believing he had authority to execute the decree. After the Tehsildar rejected the application as outside his jurisdiction, the plaintiff filed an execution petition before the competent court. The courts below dismissed the petition as time-barred. The Supreme Court held that the period spent bona fide pursuing the remedy before the Tehsildar must be excluded from the limitation period under Section 14 of the Limitation Act. Since the plaintiff acted diligently and in good faith before what it believed was the proper forum, the time taken should not count against the plaintiff. The appeal was allowed and the execution petition was restored for consideration.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Limitation Execution of Decrees Civil Procedure Jurisdiction of Courts

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login