In Brief
A man was charged under the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act and other criminal laws following a raid. After trial began, he sought to quash proceedings, arguing the police officer who investigated lacked authority under the Act. The High Court agreed and quashed the case. The Supreme Court reversed, holding that while investigation by an unauthorized officer is irregular, it does not automatically invalidate trial after cognizance is taken. The accused must demonstrate actual prejudice or miscarriage of justice. Since he failed to show such harm, the trial must proceed.
The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.