Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Monday, 21 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-08-01 disposed

R. Madhusudhan vs State of Karnataka & Anr

Bench: 2 — Kurian

In Brief

The appellants challenged the High Court's denial of anticipatory bail in cases arising under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. The High Court had held that Section 18 of the Act mandated that Trial Courts should not grant anticipatory bail. The Supreme Court did not decide the merits. Instead, it directed the appellants to surrender before the Trial Court within one month and seek regular bail. The Court permitted the appellants to argue before the Trial Court that they had complied with bail conditions and cooperated with investigators. The Trial Court was directed to pass final orders on the bail application on the date of surrender.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Procedure Bail Anticipatory Bail Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login