Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Monday, 21 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-08-01 disposed

R. Madhusudhan vs State of Karnataka & Anr

Bench: 2 — Kurian

In Brief

R. Madhusudhan and co-appellants challenged the High Court's denial of anticipatory bail in two criminal cases under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. The Supreme Court disposed of the appeals without deciding the merits, directing the appellants to surrender before the Trial Court within one month. The Court held that the Trial Court, not the appellate court, is the proper forum to consider bail applications once the charge sheet is filed. The appellants may raise their contentions—including two years of bail without misuse and cooperation with investigators—before the Trial Court at that stage.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Procedure Bail Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Anticipatory Bail

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login