Breaking Constructive Criticism Essential for Democracy, but School Curricula Must Remain Fair and Verified: Supreme Court
New Delhi · Wednesday, 23 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-08-14 dismissed

Radhe Shyam Middha vs State of Delhi

Bench: 3 — Ranjan Gogoi

In Brief

The appellant was convicted of criminal contempt of court for presenting a forged bank draft to the Delhi High Court. During a property auction hearing, he submitted a demand draft purportedly on behalf of 'Harry Township Ltd.' to increase a bidding offer. When challenged, the draft was confirmed as forged. The appellant claimed he had unknowingly received the draft from another person, Gurmeet Singh Wadhalia. The High Court rejected this explanation as implausible and found he had deliberately used the forged document to obstruct the auction proceedings. The Supreme Court upheld the conviction and one-month imprisonment sentence, finding the appellant had intentionally interfered with judicial administration, though noting the sentence was lenient."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Contempt of Court Criminal Contempt Judicial Process Forged Documents

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login