Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Thursday, 30 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2026-01-20 allowed

Raj Singh Gehlot & Ors vs Amitabha Sen & Ors

Bench: 2 — J. B. Pardiwala, Sandeep Mehta

In Brief

A property developer (Ambience Developers) obtained a license in 1993 to build a residential housing project on 18.98 acres in Haryana. The company later converted 8 acres to commercial use (Ambience Mall), reducing the residential area to 10.98 acres. Apartment buyers sued in the High Court, claiming this violated land-use rules and statutory provisions. The High Court ruled in their favour, quashing the commercial approvals and ordering CBI investigation. The Supreme Court reversed this, holding that the approved housing layout plan always specified 10.98 acres, not the full 18.98 acres. The Court found the de-licensing and commercial conversion were legally permissible, upheld the authority's 2021 reasoned order, and clarified that the National Green Tribunal lacked jurisdiction over building-plan disputes already pending in the High Court.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Urban Land Development Real Estate Regulation Administrative Law Environmental Law Writ Jurisdiction Building Laws Town Planning Consumer Protection Public Interest Litigation

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login