Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Friday, 31 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2024-01-11 allowed

THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AND OTHERS vs YOGENDERA MOHAN SENGUPTA AND ANOTHER

Bench: 2 — B.R. Gavai, Aravind Kumar

In Brief

The Supreme Court held that the National Green Tribunal exceeded its jurisdiction by directing the State of Himachal Pradesh to prepare its development plan for Shimla Planning Area in a particular manner. The Court found that drafting and approving development plans under the Himachal Pradesh Town & Country Planning Act constitutes delegated legislative power. No tribunal with limited jurisdiction can direct a delegated legislator how to exercise its legislative functions, just as courts cannot direct the legislature or executive on matters of policy. The NGT's orders banning construction in green belt and forest areas transgressed its limits. The Court balanced environmental concerns with development needs, noting the development plan included adequate safeguards. It also found that the NGT should not have continued proceedings while writ petitions were pending in the High Court, which has supervisory jurisdiction over the tribunal. The appeals were allowed and NGT orders quashed.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Administrative Law Environmental Law Town and Country Planning Separation of Powers Tribunal Jurisdiction Delegated Legislation Judicial Review

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login