Breaking Supreme Court of India Advocates Balanced Approach to Diwali Firecracker Regulations
New Delhi · Friday, 30 October 2026
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-02-28 allowed

Rajagopal vs Muthupandi @ Thavakkalai & Ors

Bench: 2 — R.F. Nariman

In Brief

Five accused persons armed with deadly weapons attacked and severely injured Rajagopal at a bus stop in 1999, causing grave injuries including skull fractures and amputation of both legs. The trial court convicted all five under IPC Sections 148 and 307/149, sentencing them to seven years imprisonment. The High Court acquitted them citing procedural defects and missing evidence. The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, holding that the injured eyewitness's unshaken direct evidence—identifying each accused and their specific role—was sufficient for conviction, and the High Court wrongly disregarded this evidence without finding it unreliable. The conviction and sentence were restored.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Procedure Evidence Eyewitness Evidence Appeal Against Acquittal Common Object of Unlawful Assembly Criminal Assault Appellate Review

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login