Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Wednesday, 05 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2020-03-19 allowed

Rajasthan State Electricity Board Jaipur vs Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax (Assessment) & Anr

Bench: 2 — <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

Rajasthan State Electricity Board claimed depreciation on assets in its income tax return without applying the 75% restriction imposed by the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 1991 for companies. The tax authority demanded additional tax under section 143(1-A). The Supreme Court held that section 143(1-A) cannot be mechanically invoked; it requires proof that the lesser amount in the return resulted from an attempt to evade tax. Since the assessee's claim resulted from a bona fide oversight and there was no intent to evade tax—especially as the assessee remained in loss even after the 25% disallowance—the demand was unjustified. The appeal was allowed.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Income Tax Tax Assessment Depreciation Taxation Laws Assessment Procedure

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login