Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Wednesday, 05 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2020-03-19 allowed

RAJASTHAN STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD JAIPUR vs THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (ASSESSMENT)

Bench: 3 — R. Banumathi, Ashok Bhushan, A.S. Bopanna

In Brief

The Rajasthan State Electricity Board filed its income tax return for 1991-92 claiming a loss, but erroneously claimed 100% depreciation instead of the lawful 75% due to a bona fide oversight. The tax authority disallowed 25% of the depreciation and demanded additional income tax under Section 143(1-A). The Supreme Court held that Section 143(1-A)—which imposes 20% additional tax when adjustments increase income or reduce loss—applies only when the assessee intentionally attempted to evade tax. Since the assessee's error was bona fide, claimed no evasion intent could be shown, and the assessee remained in loss even after the adjustment, the Court set aside the demand and allowed the appeal.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Income Tax Tax Penalties Administrative Law Statutory Interpretation Government Company

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login