Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Tuesday, 11 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-02-07 allowed

Rajiv @ Raju vs State of Haryana

Bench: 2 — Unknown 1, Unknown 2

In Brief

On 28 October 1990, a truck was robbed at 1 a.m. on the Jhajjar-Rohtak Highway, with Rs. 86,000 taken. Two appellants were convicted of robbery under IPC sections 394 and 34. The Supreme Court allowed their appeal on the ground that both key pieces of evidence—eyewitness identification and confessions—were unreliable and could not mutually support each other. The Court found that no Test Identification Parade was conducted despite the nighttime incident offering only headlight illumination, and the confessions contained irreconcilable contradictions about a recovered amount. The appellants were acquitted."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Law Evidence Identification Confession Robbery Criminal Procedure

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login