Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Tuesday, 11 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-02-07 allowed

Rajiv @ Raju vs State of Haryana

Bench: 2 — <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

On 28 October 1990, a truck was robbed at night on the Jhajjar-Rohtak Highway with Rs. 86,000 stolen. Two men were convicted and sentenced to two years imprisonment for robbery under IPC sections 394 and 34. The Supreme Court acquitted them, finding that the identification of the appellants was unreliable—made in court three years after the incident despite no physical descriptions being recorded in the FIR or police statements. Further, conflicting confessions about recovery of Rs. 4,000 (claimed spent in one, untouched for nine months in another) demonstrated investigative negligence. The Court held that neither identification nor confession met evidentiary standards, requiring acquittal and benefit of doubt to the accused."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Law Evidence Criminal Procedure Identification Confession Robbery

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login