Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Saturday, 08 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-01-24 dismissed

Raju Ambadas Gangekar vs State of Maharashtra

Bench: 2 — D.Y. Chandrachud

In Brief

A police constable was convicted by the High Court of culpable homicide (Section 304 Part II IPC) for assaulting an Army Captain who subsequently died, after the trial court had acquitted him. The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's reversal of the acquittal. The evidence—comprising eyewitness testimony of a beat constable, the victim's dying declaration describing the assailant's distinctive clothing, and blood-stained clothes recovered from the appellant within hours matching the victim's blood group—established guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The trial court had unreasonably rejected crucial evidence. The Court held that appellate courts may reverse acquittals where the trial court's judgment suffers from perversity and causes miscarriage of justice. The appeal was dismissed and the appellant was ordered to surrender.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Procedure Appellate Jurisdiction Reversal of Acquittal Evidence Law Dying Declaration Circumstantial Evidence Miscarriage of Justice

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login