Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Saturday, 08 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-10-03 partly_allowed

Ram Lal vs State of Himachal Pradesh

Bench: 2 — R. Banumathi

In Brief

Ram Lal, employed as a peon in United Commercial Bank, was assigned clerical duties due to staff shortage. He allegedly misappropriated deposits by receiving cash from account holders, making entries in their passbooks, but pocketing the money without crediting bank accounts. When depositors sought withdrawals, he created false credit entries to facilitate payments. The Supreme Court upheld his conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act and IPC sections for misappropriation and falsification of accounts. Holding that his extra-judicial confessional statements were voluntarily made and could sustain conviction, the Court partly allowed the appeal by reducing his sentence on the offence of misappropriation from five to three years.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Law Prevention of Corruption Act Misappropriation of Public Funds Extra-Judicial Confession Evidence Forgery and Falsification of Documents

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login