Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Saturday, 08 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-10-03 partly_allowed

Ram Lal vs State of Himachal Pradesh

Bench: 2 — R. Banumathi

In Brief

Ram Lal, a bank peon, was convicted of misappropriating approximately Rs 38,500 from a United Commercial Bank while illegally performing clerical duties. He received deposits from customers, entered them in passbooks, but pocketed the cash and later created fake credit entries to permit fraudulent withdrawals. The Supreme Court upheld his conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act and IPC, holding that his written confessions were voluntary and admissible despite being made before senior officers. The Court held extra-judicial confessions need not be corroborated if proven voluntary. The Court partly allowed the appeal by reducing the sentence under Section 409 IPC from five years to three years, considering the passage of time.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Corruption Misappropriation of Funds Evidence Extra-Judicial Confession Bank Fraud Criminal Procedure Sentencing

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login