Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Friday, 07 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-05-10

RAM PARSHOTAM MITTAL vs HOTEL QUEEN ROAD PVT.LTD. ANDORS

Bench: 2 — Arun Mishra, Indira Banerjee

In Brief

Ram Parshotam Mittal owned Hotel Queen Road Pvt. Ltd. (HQRL), a Delhi hotel. In three Board meetings between 2004–2005, Mittal and his wife allotted shares to themselves and transferred shares from parent company Moral to Mittal, allegedly without notice to co-director Ashok Mittal (Mittal's brother) and in violation of laws on director conflict of interest. Preference shareholder Hillcrest challenged the allotments as oppressive under the Companies Act. The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision to cancel the share allotments, finding that the Board meetings violated mandatory procedural rules (no notice to Ashok Mittal), conflicted-director provisions, and share-transfer documentation requirements. The Court held a series of breaches collectively constituted oppression, as R.P. Mittal's group excluded Ashok Mittal (who had substantially funded the company) and Hillcrest from share offers.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Corporate Law Companies Act Oppression and Mismanagement Directors' Fiduciary Duties Share Allotment and Transfer Preference Shareholders' Rights Voting Rights Procedural Compliance Board Meetings

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login