Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Monday, 03 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2020-11-18 dismissed

Ram Sharan Maurya and others vs State of U.P. and others

Bench: 2 — Sanjay Kumar, Raf Mehta

In Brief

The Supreme Court upheld the State Government's power to set minimum qualifying marks (65-60%) for Assistant Teacher recruitment after the examination was completed. The Court held that such post-examination fixation of cut-offs is permissible under the UP Basic Education (Teachers) Service Rules, 1981, provided it is done in good faith to select the best available talent. All candidates appearing in the same examination form a homogenous class. The Court found the 65-60% cut-off justified when compared with the number of qualified candidates against available vacancies. Multiple appeals by affected candidates were dismissed, though the Court left discretion to the State regarding assistance to under-subscribed categories like ex-servicemen and persons with disabilities.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Administrative Law Public Service Commission Educational Law Service Rules Recruitment

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login