Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Monday, 21 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2016-11-09 allowed

V. Lavanya & Ors vs State of Tamil Nadu & Ors

— <item>R. Banumathi</item> </invoke>

In Brief

This batch of appeals concerns the appointment of Secondary Grade Teachers and B.T. Assistants in Tamil Nadu. The State Government relaxed the passing marks in the Teacher Eligibility Test (TET) from 60% to 55% for candidates belonging to Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, Backward Classes, and other reserved categories. Unsuccessful candidates challenged this relaxation as arbitrary and as an impermissible mid-process change in selection criteria. The High Court's two benches delivered conflicting decisions. The Supreme Court held that the relaxation was valid under NCTE Guidelines Clause 9, constitutional principles of equality, and the State's reservation policy. The Court ruled that relaxation did not alter basic eligibility criteria and was within State's constitutional powers. The Madurai Bench judgment was set aside and Madras Bench affirmed.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login