Breaking Supreme Court of India Advocates Balanced Approach to Diwali Firecracker Regulations
New Delhi · Saturday, 07 November 2026
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-09-20 allowed

Ranjit Rao vs State of Uttar Pradesh and Others

Bench: 2 — <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

An Additional Advocate General appointed to conduct cases in the Supreme Court challenged the State's non-payment of his bills on the ground that he was not notified as a public prosecutor under Section 24 Cr.P.C., 1973. The State later denied authorization citing Government Orders. The Supreme Court held that the State's acceptance of the counsel's services over 18 months without contemporaneous objection, coupled with payment of advocates-on-record bills for the same cases, creates an equitable right to payment. The Court rejected the State's belated denial of authorization as unfair and inequitable, directing immediate payment of all outstanding bills within eight weeks.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Procedure Employment & Service Law Administrative Law Government Counsels

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login