Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Wednesday, 23 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2016-05-03 partly_allowed

Ravi Prakash Refineries (P) Ltd vs State of Karnataka

Bench: 2 — Dipak Misra

In Brief

Ravi Prakash Refineries sold sunflower de-oiled cake (DOC) in inter-State trade, initially taxed at 2% under a CST notification listing "oil cake" as eligible for reduced tax. The revenue later reopened the assessment, arguing DOC was taxable at 4%, not 2%. The appeal raised whether DOC and oil cake are the same commodity. The Supreme Court held that oil cake and de-oiled cake are two distinct products, as enumerated separately in the statutory Schedule. The notification must be strictly construed and cannot be extended to include products not explicitly listed. However, the Court partially allowed the appeal: while the High Court's finding that the products differ was correct, the initial assessment should not have been reopened, as the assessing officer had properly examined the claim. The assessee retains the benefit of the initial 2% assessment.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Taxation Sales Tax Central Sales Tax Product Classification Notification Interpretation

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login