Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Wednesday, 23 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-01-05 remanded

Commissioner Central Excise, Bangalore vs United Spirits Ltd. & Anr

Bench: 2 — Dipak Misra

In Brief

The Commissioner of Central Excise challenged the Customs Appellate Tribunal's order regarding the assessability of food flavours manufactured by United Spirits Ltd. The company mixed odoriferous substances (duty-paid essences) and claimed such mixing did not constitute manufacture. It received royalty from contract bottling units but argued this was unrelated to food flavour prices. The tribunal accepted these contentions and found two show cause notices time-barred. The Supreme Court held the tribunal's reasoning was ambiguous and insufficiently factual. While reaffirming that manufacture requires transformation into a distinct product, the Court remitted the matter for detailed reconsideration of the process involved, royalty nexus, and limitation dates.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Central Excise Manufacture Assessable Value Food Flavours Royalty Limitation Tariff Classification Valuation Rules

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login