Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Friday, 31 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2024-03-06 partly_allowed

RAVINDER KUMAR vs STATE OF NCT OF DELHI

Bench: 2 — B.R. Gavai, Sandeep Mehta

In Brief

Ravinder Kumar was convicted of murdering his wife Meena, whose body was found with a slit throat in their home in May 2004, along with their young son. The trial and High Court convicted him primarily on circumstantial evidence including bloodstained clothes recovered from the parental home and a calendar bearing his contact details. The Supreme Court set aside the murder conviction, holding that the prosecution failed to establish an unbroken chain of circumstantial evidence beyond reasonable doubt. The critical distinction between 'may have committed' and 'must have committed' was not met. However, convictions for culpable homicide and cruelty were maintained. The appellant was released after spending over 15 years in prison.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Law Circumstantial Evidence Homicide Cruelty Supreme Court Standards of Proof

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login