Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Friday, 07 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-02-28 partly_allowed

Regional Provident Fund Commissioner (II) West Bengal vs Vivekananda Vidyamandir and Others

Bench: 2 — Navin Sinha

In Brief

This judgment concerns whether special allowances paid by establishments to their employees should be included in "basic wages" for Provident Fund deduction purposes under the Employees' Provident Fund Act, 1952. The Supreme Court held that the crucial test is universality: allowances paid across the board to all employees in a category constitute basic wages subject to Provident Fund deduction, regardless of nomenclature. Variable or incentive-linked payments available only to some employees are excluded. The establishment bears the onus of proving variability or incentive linkage. Civil Appeal No. 6221 of 2011 (Regional RPFC v. Vivekananda Vidyamandir) was allowed; the other four appeals by establishments were dismissed."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Provident Fund Labour Law Employee Benefits Statutory Interpretation

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login