In Brief
The Supreme Court examined whether special allowances paid by employers to employees constitute "basic wages" subject to Provident Fund deduction under the Employees' Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952. The Court held that the critical test is universality: allowances paid across the board to all employees in a particular category are basic wages, unless proven to be variable, linked to production incentives, or earned only by those availing the opportunity. Finding no evidence that the disputed allowances met any exception criteria, the Court concluded they were camouflaged basic wages. It allowed the Commissioner's appeal in one case but dismissed the employers' appeals in others."
The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.