Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Saturday, 08 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-01-21 allowed

Reliance Infrastructure Limited vs State of Maharashtra and Ors

Bench: 2 — Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud

In Brief

Reliance Infrastructure challenged the Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission's Regulation 44.2(d), which prescribed a more stringent Station Heat Rate norm for its Dahanu thermal power plant compared to other similar units. The appellant claimed this discriminated against it for operating efficiently. The Supreme Court upheld the regulation, holding that regulatory commissions have broad discretion to set operating norms based on complex factors including past performance, efficiency levels, and policy objectives. The Court emphasized that tariff fixation is an expert function, and courts should not interfere absent manifest unreasonableness or procedural breaches. The Court also clarified that regulations can only be challenged via writ petitions under Article 226, not through appellate tribunals, and set aside costs imposed on the appellant for pursuing this remedy.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Electricity Law Regulatory Law Tariff Regulation Administrative Law Constitutional Law Judicial Review

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login