Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Thursday, 30 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2025-04-16 allowed

RIKHAB BIRANI & ANR vs STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR

Bench: 2 — Sanjiv Khanna, Sanjay Kumar

In Brief

Two parties entered an oral agreement to sell a godown for ₹1.35 crore. The buyer claimed to have paid ₹19 lakh toward the purchase price between June-September 2020, but a ₹10 lakh cheque bounced. After a year, the sellers sold the property at ₹90 lakh due to changed circumstances. The buyer filed an FIR alleging cheating, criminal breach of trust, intimidation, and insult. Despite two dismissals by the lower court, the Police registered an FIR. The High Court dismissed the quash petition. The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, holding that breach of contract and non-payment of consideration, without fraudulent intention at inception, do not constitute criminal offences. The chargesheet was deficient in substantive particulars. The Court imposed ₹50,000 costs on Uttar Pradesh for misusing criminal process.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Procedure Criminal Law Cheating Criminal Breach of Trust Contract Civil v. Criminal Section 482 CrPC Chargesheet Cognizance Abuse of Process

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login