Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Friday, 07 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-02-05 dismissed

RITU BHATIA vs MINISTRY OF CIVIL SUPPLIES CONSUMER AFFAIRS AND PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION

Bench: 2 — L. Nageswara Rao, M.R. Shah

In Brief

Ritu Bhatia applied for the position of Company Secretary, which required five years' post-qualification experience "as" a Company Secretary. Though she worked in various roles, much of her experience was gained as a Management Trainee or Assistant Company Secretary. When the employer discovered this did not meet the stated requirement, her appointment was terminated. The Supreme Court upheld the termination, holding that the word "as" means formal appointment and actual work in that specific position. Experience gained under a different designation, even if similar duties were performed, does not satisfy the requirement. The Court declined to read the criterion broadly.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Labour Law Employment Law Administrative Law Service Termination Statutory Qualifications

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login