Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Monday, 10 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-07-30 partly_allowed

Ruby Tour Services Pvt. Ltd vs Union of India

Bench: 2 — Ashok Bhushan

In Brief

Three private tour operators challenged the Ministry of Minority Affairs' rejection of their Haj 2018 registration applications. The Court set aside the rejection of one PTO (Nawab Travels) because the grounds—minor typographical errors in a tour assistant's name and passport details—were trivial and the correct information was separately submitted. Dismissing the other two petitions, the Court found the turnover objection valid (PTO was a company relying on proprietorship firm figures) and accommodation receipts issue unaddressed. For the successful petitioner, the Court awarded Rs. 5 lakh compensation in public law damages for wrongful rejection, payable within two months with 15% interest if delayed.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Administrative Law Writ Jurisdiction Constitutional Law Right to Equality Article 14 Article 32 Arbitrariness Compensation in Public Law Tourism Regulation Haj Policy

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login