Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Saturday, 01 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2023-03-15 allowed

S. ATHILAKSHMI vs THE STATE REP. BY THE DRUGS INSPECTOR

Bench: 2 — Krishna Murari, Sudhanshu Dhulia

In Brief

A registered medical practitioner with specialization in dermatology was prosecuted for stocking medicines for sale without a valid license under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act. The Court found that she had supplied small quantities of medicines to her own patients, which falls within the exemption granted to medical practitioners under Schedule K of the Rules. The Court held that mere possession of medicines does not constitute an offence; the prosecution must prove stocking or exhibition for sale. The Court quashed the criminal proceedings, noting the sanctioning authority failed to consider the applicable exemptions and the non-commercial nature of the doctor's practice. The two-year unexplained delay in granting sanction also supported the decision to quash.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Drugs and Cosmetics Law Medical Practice Regulation Criminal Procedure Quashing of Criminal Proceedings

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login