Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Sunday, 20 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-12-13 disposed

Sabu Mathew George vs Union of India and others

Bench: 3 — Dipak Misra

In Brief

This petition sought directions to block websites and advertisements promoting sex determination and prenatal sex selection in violation of the 1994 Act. The Court held that search engines (Google, Yahoo, Microsoft) are legally obligated to comply with Section 22 of the PCPNDT Act and must implement an auto-block doctrine to prevent such content proactively. A Nodal Agency was established to receive complaints. While rejecting the search engines' defence under Article 19(1)(a), the Court emphasized that freedom of information does not extend to prohibited content. The Court directed a collaborative meeting between the government, search engines, civil society, and petitioner to develop comprehensive solutions beyond static keyword lists, recognizing the dynamic nature of internet challenges in protecting sex ratios and women's constitutional rights.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Reproductive Rights Constitutionalism Sex Selection/Female Foeticide Freedom of Information Internet and Intermediaries Administrative Law Public Interest Litigation

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login