Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Sunday, 20 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-02-16 partly_allowed

Sabu Mathew George vs Union of India and other

Bench: 2 — <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

A doctor filed a writ petition challenging whether Google, Yahoo, and Microsoft were adequately complying with Section 22 of the PC-PNDT Act, 1994—which prohibits advertisements promoting sex selection. The Court held that search engines must proactively block sex-selection-related content through an auto-block mechanism, not merely respond to complaints. The Court directed the Union of India to establish a Nodal Agency to receive complaints and coordinate compliance, with deletion mandated within 36 hours. Each search engine must set up an In-House Expert Body to independently delete violating content. The Court rejected Article 19(1)(a) defences for prohibited speech and emphasized that declining sex ratio demands concrete enforcement action.">

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Constitutional Law Fundamental Rights Gender Discrimination Public Health Internet Regulation Sex Selection

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login