Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Thursday, 30 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2025-04-21 allowed

SACHIN vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Bench: 2 — B.V. Nagarathna, Satish Chandra Sharma

In Brief

This case involved an appellant convicted under the POCSO Act and initially sentenced to seven years imprisonment. The High Court and Special Court erroneously converted this to life imprisonment plus a fine. The appellant had by then served eleven years and eight months in jail. The Supreme Court found the higher courts' orders legally erroneous and set them aside. Exercising its constitutional powers under Article 142 to do complete justice, the Court restored the original seven-year sentence and ordered the appellant's immediate release, since he had already served more time than the original sentence. The appeal was allowed and the appellant released forthwith.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Law Sentencing Article 142 of Constitution Equitable Relief Judicial Error POCSO Act Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login