Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Wednesday, 23 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-11-13 allowed

Sagar Pandurang Dhundare vs Keshav Aaba Patil and Others

Bench: 2 — Kurian

In Brief

The Supreme Court addressed whether family members of original encroachers on Government land can be disqualified from serving as Panchayat members under the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958. The appellants were not themselves encroachers but beneficiaries of their father's/grandfather's encroachment. The Court held that disqualification applies only to the person who made the original encroachment, not to family members or beneficiaries. The Court noted that where the legislature intended family-based disqualification, it explicitly provided so (as in other clauses). Courts cannot expand statutory language through interpretation to achieve laudable public policy goals without clear legislative intention. However, those punished for or finally evicted for encroachment remain disqualified. The appeals were allowed and impugned judgments set aside.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Local Government Law Election Law Constitutional Law Statutory Interpretation Disqualifications Panchayat

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login