Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Sunday, 13 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2026-06-04 allowed

Sahil Abdulsattar Mansuri & Ors vs Safimahamad Fafirbhai Mansuri & Ors

Bench: 2 — Sanjay Karol, Augustine George Masih

In Brief

A father filed a criminal complaint in 2002 alleging his property was illegally transferred through forged signatures while he was on pilgrimage. Despite an FSL report confirming forgery in 2017, the police lost active case files in transit and failed to file formal charges for nearly two decades, despite repeated court orders. The High Court refused to intervene. The Supreme Court held that the right to a speedy trial under Article 21 requires timely investigation completion. It ruled that constitutional courts must intervene when investigative machinery completely fails, rather than passive reliance on lower courts. The Court directed police to file a final report within six weeks and imposed strict disciplinary accountability on defaulting officers.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Constitutional Law Criminal Procedure Right to Life Speedy Trial Police Investigation Institutional Accountability Judicial Overreach Administrative Negligence

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login