Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Monday, 10 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-08-10 partly_allowed

Sajid vs State of Uttarakhand and Another

Bench: 2 — Kurian

In Brief

The appellant was convicted under Sections 363 and 366 IPC (kidnapping and inducing a young woman to go with intent to force or seduce) and sentenced to seven years imprisonment. On appeal, evidence showed the victim had since married another man and they were living happily together, with the victim expressing no complaint against the appellant and no adverse impact on the community. While confirming the conviction (as the acts themselves were proven), the Court modified the sentence to time already served plus a substantial fine of Rs. 2 lakhs as compensation to the victim, striking a balance between upholding the law and recognizing genuine post-conviction reconciliation."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Law Kidnapping and Abduction Sentencing Compromise in Criminal Cases Indian Penal Code

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login