Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Sunday, 02 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2022-01-04 partly_allowed

Sandoz Private Limited vs Union of India & Others

Bench: 3 — A.M. Khanwilkar

In Brief

This case concerns whether Export Oriented Units (EOUs) and Domestic Tariff Area (DTA) suppliers are entitled to refund of Terminal Excise Duty (TED) on goods supplied under India's Foreign Trade Policy. The Supreme Court held that EOUs are entitled only to ab initio exemption from excise duty (they must procure goods duty-free) but may avail of refund entitlements of their DTA suppliers upon obtaining a disclaimer and complying with specified formalities. DTA suppliers are entitled to TED refund as deemed exports under the FTP. The modality of refund depends on payment method: if CENVAT credit was utilized, the commensurate amount must be reversed to the credit account; if paid in cash, refund is in cash with 6% p.a. simple interest. The FTP regime operates independently from the Central Excise Act. The impugned Policy Circular merely clarified existing law and applies to all qualifying supplies.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Foreign Trade Policy Export Oriented Units Terminal Excise Duty Deemed Exports Refund of Duty Central Excise CENVAT Credit Special Economic Zones

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login