Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Sunday, 20 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2016-06-03 allowed

Sarla Performance Fibers Limited Etc vs Commissioner of Central Excise, Surat-II

Bench: 2 — Dipak Misra

In Brief

A 100% export-oriented unit (EOU) manufacturing synthetic yarn was issued a show cause notice for alleged removal of goods without payment of excise duty. The unit claimed it was eligible for exemption when selling goods to the domestic market after obtaining permission. The issue was whether goods cleared to the domestic tariff area without Development Commissioner's permission attracted duty under the main section or a special proviso. The Supreme Court held that such clearances are assessable under the main Section 3(1) of the Central Excise Act, not under the proviso, following its earlier binding decision in SIV Industries Ltd. The tribunal's reliance on a distinguishing judgment was found erroneous. The appeal was allowed and the duty computation was directed to be recalculated accordingly."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Excise Duty Export Oriented Units (EOUs) Central Excise Act, 1944 Exemption Notifications

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login